← Back to Field Notes

April 30, 2025 · The Bloomfield Team

Job Shop Quoting Strategy: Pricing for Profit and Growth

A job shop in western Michigan quotes 55 RFQs per month and wins 14 of them, a 25% win rate. The owner considers that healthy. What he has never measured is the margin distribution of those 14 wins. When we analyzed 12 months of quoting data, the results told a different story: four of the 14 monthly wins carried margins above 30%, six carried margins between 18% and 25%, and four carried margins below 15%. The bottom four jobs generated 29% of revenue but only 11% of gross profit. The shop was working hard to be busy rather than working strategically to be profitable.

Quoting strategy in a job shop is portfolio management. Every RFQ is an allocation decision: does this job deserve the estimator's time, the machine capacity it will consume, and the margin it will produce? The shops that grow profitably treat quoting as their primary strategic lever, and they manage it with data.

The Three Variables

Win rate tells you whether your pricing is competitive. A win rate below 15% means the shop is consistently over-priced relative to the market for the work it is quoting. A win rate above 40% means the shop is likely under-pricing and leaving margin on the table. The target for most job shops is 20% to 30%, which balances competitiveness with margin discipline.

Average margin on won jobs tells you whether the wins are profitable. Winning 30% of quotes at 15% margin is worse than winning 20% at 28% margin. The margin distribution matters as much as the average, because a portfolio with a 25% average margin that includes five jobs at 8% margin is hiding problems that the average obscures.

Capacity utilization tells you whether the quoting volume and win rate are generating enough work to keep the floor productive. A shop running 60% utilization with 30% margins has room to be more aggressive on pricing for capacity-filling work. A shop running 90% utilization with 22% margins should be raising prices because the floor cannot absorb additional work anyway.

These three variables interact. Changing quote turnaround speed affects win rate without changing price. Raising prices reduces win rate but improves margin on the jobs that do close. Adding capacity through a second shift or a new machine changes the utilization equation and should change the pricing strategy. The shops that manage all three variables together outperform shops that manage price alone.

Pricing by Strategic Intent

Every RFQ should carry a strategic tag before the estimator builds the price. The tags are simple.

Relationship builder. A new customer with potential for recurring high-margin work. Price competitively on the first job to win the account. Accept lower margin on this specific quote with the explicit expectation that subsequent orders will carry full margin. Track the follow-through. If the customer does not return within 12 months, reclassify future RFQs from this account.

Capacity filler. Work that fits into schedule gaps during a slow period. Price at a minimum acceptable margin, which for most shops is 12% to 15% gross. This work keeps machines running and covers fixed overhead that would otherwise be absorbed by fewer jobs. The discipline here is to stop pricing at capacity-fill rates when the floor reaches 75% utilization, because the low-margin work is displacing opportunities for full-margin jobs.

Core business. Work from established customers in the shop's sweet spot of capability, complexity, and volume. Price at full margin, which should be 25% to 35% gross depending on the shop's cost structure. This category should represent 60% to 70% of the quoting portfolio.

Premium. Work that requires specialized capability, tight tolerances, exotic materials, or expedited delivery. Price above standard margin because the shop's ability to handle this work is limited supply meeting urgent demand. Premium work should carry 35% to 50% gross margin and should never be discounted to win volume.

Measuring What Matters

The quoting metrics that drive strategic improvement are: win rate by customer tier, average margin by job category, quote turnaround time, and the ratio of quotes submitted to quotes that receive a response from the buyer. The last metric is often overlooked. If the shop quotes 55 RFQs and 20 of them never receive any feedback, those 20 quotes consumed estimator time that produced zero revenue. Understanding why those quotes died, whether the job was awarded elsewhere, cancelled, or simply ignored, reveals whether the shop is quoting the right opportunities.

For a deeper look at quoting systems and AI-powered tools, see our complete guide to AI-powered quoting.

The anatomy of a winning quote includes a price that reflects the full cost of the work, a margin that reflects the strategic value of the customer and the job, and a response time that reaches the buyer while the decision is still open. Missing on any one of those three dimensions costs the shop either the job or the profit. The quoting strategy that coordinates all three is the highest-leverage growth tool a job shop has.